Several highlights can be found in this folder. To be the most prudent possible, we will not analyze it too much not to be accused of defamation, it is certain that many things are amazing.
-Nouri was the sole candidate of the actual bidding of the IMA. It is still rare, tender pulic where one candidate has visited the site, negotiates a single candidate, and finally decides not to enforce the Labor Code, without being troubled by the Buyer ( namely the EPI).
Moreover, NOUR-justified non-application of L122-12 from the following reasons:
- The room was empty of all equipment.
- Noura was not aware that there were employees.
- Nour's customers is not the same as Yara Prestige because Nour is "internationally known".
For the first argument, a finding of a bailiff ordered by the IMA itself shows that the room containing the equipment. This is demonstrated by the picture that is presented to prove that the room was empty of all equipment is a picture taken at the commencement of work (ie after every effort has been emptied).
For the second argument, given the multitude of letters signed by the IMA mentioning the issue of social workers, and the confession of negotiation between the IMA and its only candidate on the same social issue, it's hard to believe that Nour was never made aware of the existence of employees at least not to read, and be blind (how not to see them while they makes sitting on the forecourt of the IMA every day for over a month and a half?).
As the 3rd argument, it speaks for itself.
- The room was empty of all equipment.
- Noura was not aware that there were employees.
- Nour's customers is not the same as Yara Prestige because Nour is "internationally known".
For the first argument, a finding of a bailiff ordered by the IMA itself shows that the room containing the equipment. This is demonstrated by the picture that is presented to prove that the room was empty of all equipment is a picture taken at the commencement of work (ie after every effort has been emptied).
For the second argument, given the multitude of letters signed by the IMA mentioning the issue of social workers, and the confession of negotiation between the IMA and its only candidate on the same social issue, it's hard to believe that Nour was never made aware of the existence of employees at least not to read, and be blind (how not to see them while they makes sitting on the forecourt of the IMA every day for over a month and a half?).
As the 3rd argument, it speaks for itself.
0 comments:
Post a Comment