Program Remote For 2005 Hyundai Santa Fe

threatened with closure by saying people close to Mr Baudis

After just a few days of existence, this blog already seems threatened. Indeed, a man named Daniel from Laurentia, is called journalist the FIGARO pressured to stop any publication on this matter.

Here's what he wrote:

"I will not leave you alone as the blog will not be closed. What you do is slander and it's criminal. I assure you that you are taking unmeasured and unnecessary risks.

I'll leave you alone after deleting all elements referring to this case. I'll leave before 12am prevent counsel for Mr Baudis (former MP, former Chairman of the CSA, current president of the Institut du Monde Arabe, the future senator) and counsel for both institutions maligned (IMA, Noura) for criminal prosecution of three lawyers to you. "

Note that obviously, from this reporter, Mr Baudis is already guaranteed to be a senator even before the elections! What are Elections then?

Moreover, it seems in a hurry to try to stop any publication on this matter, in violation of democratic principles and freedom of expression. Bizarre for a journalist.

Regarding defamation and slander, this blog is not concerned, since it merely relaying facts and proven as well as written documents. There is no defamation on this site.

Obviously, the truth seems to bother some people. And more so that evidence of bad faith does not exist in this folder, you just have to read the following article by clicking here to get an accurate idea of the veracity of the facts asserted in this blog.

Great Ways To Congradulate Pregnancy

Mr Dominique Baudis 35 families deprived of their jobs and condoning unacceptable behavior!

This case is true, and the 35 employees who were assigned to the restoration of the Institut du Monde Arabe, and who are deprived of jobs, status and salaries since September 1st 2007.

Indeed, Dominique Baudis, the current President of the Institut du Monde Arabe (IMA) brought by public tender for a new concessionaire to restore the IMA (replacing the previous one, which he denounced contract), the famous Lebanese catering NOUR: it refuses to apply Article L.122-12 of the Labor Code which requires the resumption of employees, and said contemptuously that he will pay no salary and will not resume person.

NOUR strategy is clear: playing shows letting the matter drag on for several years justice, since he knows full well industrial tribunal that judges are not professional judges, they are not competent to judge referred a case concerning Article L.122-12 of the Labour Code. Thus, the case could drag on for very long, which no-one 'except of course Nour and the IMA.

Instead to stop this outrageous jeopardizes the part of Nour, Dominique Baudis, the prime contractor, does absolutely nothing and left to rot an already very complicated for employees (they left without wages, no job, no status or social protection): what really matters to his eyes being more likely further his political career!

Tights Volleyball Cameltoe

Summary of the case from an article of "worker" Paris of November 2007. Why

'Institut du Monde Arabe
Very good restaurant, but hard to digest!

Since September 1, employees of the restaurant Institute of the Arab world are without pay, no job and no social security coverage. The irony is that everyone washes his hands while rubbing them.

After the institute , chaired by Dominique Baudis, denounced the concession contract food that bound the company Yara Prestige benefit of society Noura, it was logical to take on the employees and the activity continues. Moreover, it was more of a Labour Code that logic!

But when it comes to assume its responsibilities, each with a disconcerting cynicism, to pass the hot potato and adapts to its own sauce. The situation is this: Yara Luxury is no longer operating the restaurant, but employees are still in place. No termination has been notified, since the transfer is legally automatic. In addition, the Institute intends to retain the activity of the restaurant under its responsibility. This requires an urgent renovation moreover, its activity ceased in advance since early September, which does not help employees who do not know who to contact to resolve their situation.

Institute, initially, tried to blame Luxury in Yara grounds that these employees belong to him and had to repeat them. When CGT was noticed there was no question that employees sit on two months' salary and they wanted to continue working on their website, the version has changed. Especially as we Baudis reminded that the Institute maintained that it imposed the restoration and renovation of the restaurant. Unwilling to pay, or even advance wages, Baudis was once eager to send to the transferee company Noura, although the responsibility of the Institute vis-à-vis employees of the restaurant is clearly established.

As Noura society, the answer is like a giant arm of honor, to employees as the labor code: she says with contempt it will pay no salary and no person will resume.

Obviously before the Labour Court as we know it will be resolved, but we still need to acknowledge and encourage our comrades who are fighting for their jobs and denounce the last three months the attitude of the payer as that of the buyer. In our view, neither one nor the other employees want to keep.

We will not fail to have special attention to Dominique Baudis who opened with great fanfare the new restaurant with his new card and new employees when he said in Le Parisien, 24 October: We are perplexed by the position Noura society. Had we known we would not accept this teaching. "

A special menu has been crafted for our comrades. Baudis has prepared the Turkish delight and peeled onions and when to Noura: it has responsible for the harissa ... "

Remi Picaud and Stephane Fustec, the Journal of the Departmental Union CGT Paris.

Europe Cooking School

Nouri refused to apply Article L.122-12


The famous Lebanese catering

NOUR ( http://www.noura.com/ ) refuses to take on the employees of the restoration of the IMA because according to him, the conditions of application of Article L. 122-12 of the Labor Code are not met in this case because there is no continuation of an economic entity retaining its identity and whose work is continued or resumed.

For this he cites the following arguments:

- He was not aware of employees at his arrival.

We will have to explain to us as the sign has been involved in a tender indicating the existence of 35 employees as if they did not exist (given that the social issue is a given incompressible tender)? Also difficult to believe that Nour was unaware when he arrived there were employees on site, whereas they were present every day on the front of the IMA for their rights and the resumption of their work ?

- The room contained no material.

A bailiff carried out at the request of the Arab World Institute shows otherwise, it contains a list of all the hardware on site at the time of arrival of the new dealership.

-Finally, NOUR justify non-application of Article L.122-12 by the fact that its production methods are different.

In counsel's Catering, "(...) the previous operator exercised a catering business and as such, he produced, manufactured and manufactured the dishes on the spot. NOUR company (...) has a central kitchen, which is responsible for manufacture, make and deliver to restaurants all the group meals already prepared, so that the Company will manufacture NOUR not place the dishes. "(sic)

This argument, besides the fact it is quite amazing for a restaurant, do not allow non-application of Article L.122-12.

Tv Theme Tune Spanish Flea

The letter denounced, sent to the Elysée

We publish today a letter sent by an employee of the President of the Republic, Mr Nicolas Sarkozy. It provides a clear summary of the case at bar .

" Paris, December 12, 2007


Mr. President,

Since September, 35 families live without resources, without jobs and without incorporation with no coverage, no aid possible since we are still seen in the eyes of the law as "employees".

I am writing to you on behalf of all my colleagues to challenge you and draw your attention to our plight.

Indeed, just days after the installation of Mr Dominique Baudis president of the Arab World Institute in Paris, In February 2007 he decided to break the contract for services in restaurants in the IMA with our former employer, the Company YARA-PRESTIGE 'notice until August 31 2007.

Faced with this uncertainty, Mr Baudis reassured us about our jobs we confirm that the Labour Code (Article L122-12) applies and the new operator will resume any employment contracts, as well as various letters and documents from the IMA recalled and confirmed.

Only on 1 October 2007 that the IMA told us signing the contract with Nour, while the latter had indeed been created under the name of the IMA-NOUR Monday, September 3, 2007 with reference to commencement of operations within the IMA itself and with its approval.

Mr. President, the minute I write, we still have not received our salaries due since September 1, 2007. And worse, the new operator precludes the application of the law.

It is obvious that we have exhausted all means in our possession to assert our rights, we warned the unions that helped us and the services of the Ministry of Labour, and we finally brought our case to the Board Industrial Tribunal for interim relief, in vain.

We certainly believe in justice, but we can not afford to wait years for court proceedings. We pay a high price mismanaged a case that raises many questions. Why

that speed and precipitation in the breaking of a contract without cause and without regard for its social and financial consequences?

Why this method is unclear and lacking transparency with which the call for applications was launched? This seems grossly lacking some elements, we note primarily the fact that negotiations linger between the IMA and the Company Nour on a subject not negotiable is the social aspect, not to mention that only the Nour was competing , where the question of the usefulness of a call for applications since the candidate is known and seems designated in advance. What we also clearly said Mr Baudis.

And finally, does it contract with the Company Nour is really interesting and beneficial financially for the IMA to sacrifice our rights and our jobs?

Indeed, the contract stipulates a million euro investment by the Company Nour. It also states that the IMA will reimburse the Company in March 2008 NOUR 300 000, 00 €. On 700 000, 00 € remaining, representing the true commitment of Nour in this case, 400 000, 00 € will be spent on the purchase of small equipment that will remain in the assets of the Company. It leaves only 300 000, 00 € real investment on behalf of IMA and not one million euros as announced with great fanfare by each other.

According to this contract, must pay NOUR 150 000, 00 € per year in rent over a period of ten years, a total of 1.5 million, 00 €. The financial contribution of Nour rises so after this period to 1.5 million, 00 + 300 000 €, 00 € originally invested a total of 1.8 million, 00 €. The deadweight loss of the IMA would be 1.2 million, 00 € in comparison with what the former claimant settled with 300 000, 00 € per year.

The generosity of the IMA does not stop there, he gave this company the right to use its logo, as forecourt parking and communication.

This case reflects in any case a serious injustice even more than the EPI does not condemn the actions of his new partner, worse still defends the courts nor the obligation to comply with the law of Furthermore we believe there is a void Contract.
Mr. President, if the economic interests of the IMA are not defended, and if our rights are violated, then what would the real motives of this whole affair?

Mr. President, you call out so that you can act with relevant officials in order to stop this injustice and finding the fastest ways to resolve this situation.

Counting on your understanding and your commitment, please accept Mr. Speaker, our most perfect consideration and our most respectful greetings. "

Gordon Binoculars Manual

Simplified overview of the facts (for those who want a quick summary): Mr Baudis 35 employees deprived of employment and endorse the unacceptable!

-In February 2007, Dominique Baudis is elected President of the Institut du Monde Arabe.

-On 1 March 2007, he denounced the contract restaurant delivery service then in place, Yara Prestige for the following reason: the restaurant needs work, we must launch a tender public to find a new supplier for them.

-From May to August 2007 , IMA will require written repeatedly to the company Yara Prestige provide information on its workforce, to the application of Article L122-12 of the Labour Code relating to recovery of personnel engaged in an economic entity to be transferred. Yara Prestige will respond to all requests of the IMA.
Moreover, the call for tenders launched by the IMA will obviously lead to an effective one candidate, the caterer Lebanese Nour, the only restaurateur to visit the site.

- In August 2007, employees of Yara Luxury organize and write to the Chairman, Mr Baudis, to inform them of their concern. Indeed, no buyer has been officially designated although rumors all agree to designate as Noura holding the rope. Mr Baudis then reassures employees telling them that the article L122-12 does apply when the arrival of a new owner, and he agrees that such transfer is indeed observed .

-On 1 September 2007 , employees go to the IMA to continue their work, and are expelled from the site. The IMA then glue the posters "In work" on all its eateries. That same day, Mr. Baudet (the Deputy Chief Executive of the IMA) inform the manager of the company Yara Prestige signed an exchange of letter with Sté NOUR for the restaurant operations of the IMA, and that coordinated YARA-PRESTIGE were sent to company Nour for the implementation of the L122-12.

The exchange of letters will be adjusted on 1 October 2007 with the signing of a contract between the IMA and "Nour IMA, which will be a subsidiary of Nour, who will operate the restaurant areas of the Institute.

Officially, according to the Law and the letters of the IMA, the employees of the restoration of the Institut du Monde Arabe, therefore Noura as a new employer. But it is the amazement through its Director, Mr Jean-Paul Bou Antoun, Noura said that he refuses to resume employment contracts because the article L122-12 of the Labour Code is not applicable here.

employees are jobless, penniless and without social protection since 1 September 2007.
Noura still refuses to enforce the law (Article L.122-12, public order), and has more coverage silent and ashamed of the Institut du Monde Arabe, the Buyer who does not flinch and does not resume at the new dealership employees.