Make Someone Fall Asleep Using Pressure Points

The scandal continues

Despite the legal conviction of Nour in the case of employees, this is what the 'sign is used to write to employees:

"letter with AR

" Madam, "

" The Order made by the Labour Court February 5, 2008 ordered "Further work contract vote, with the reservation of right of entry for trial."
This ordinance also makes it clear that the decision "does not prejudge the determination of the employer."

"We have already appealed against this decision before the trial court. However in the case of a binding decision, we are compelled to respect, pending the outcome of pending proceedings, we will subject our rights. "

" We wish to confirm soaps, as needed, that we do not consider your employer question which will be debated by the Labour Court referred the merits. "

" Thus, assuming that the order of February 5, 2008 will be contradicted by the trial court, our temporary employment relationship, immediately become null and void, without further formality or compensation of any kind. You must then repay any monies you have received a provisional basis. "

" In case the order of February 5, 2008 will be confirmed by the trial judge, your employment will be confirmed to current conditions. "

" Accordingly, and pursuant to an order to " provisionally " and without our recognition as an employer, we invite you to submit to February 22, 2008 Nouri IMA (...)."


=> What's more, except that this letter to employees is really "special." Despite his conviction, NOUR IMA considers itself not being the employer and can recall in his letter.

Moreover, Nour IMA appealed, and informed the employees that they will seek reimbursement of all wages earned as a provisional order if contradicted by the trial judge.

Billy Goat Lawn Vacuum

sentenced Nour! The Truth Blog

The umpire judge made the decision following the hearing held February 5, 2008 at 09 h 00: "(...)

Recognizes the existence of a manifestly unlawful. Met exonerated the company Yara PRESTIGE. (...) Condemns severally HOLDING Nour and Nour IMA payable as an advance on account of wages covering the period 1 September 2007 to January 15, 2008.
(...) Condemns severally Nour HOLDING Nour and IMA to pay each applicant the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED EUROS (800 euros) as a provision for claims on damages and the sum of FIVE HUNDRED EURO (EUR 500) on the basis of Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Ordered borne by Nour and Nour HOLDING IMA continuing contracts of employment of applicants. (...) Remember that the order is fully enforceable provisionally. Condemns Nour and Nour HOLDING IMA costs. "

The 28 employees protected by the CGT at last succeeded to justice so that their rights are more violated.

However, the struggle for the restoration of truth does not stop there.

It is the 4 employees who have made a follow parallel approach, which they have appealed the decision rendered incompetent by the court for interim measures of employment tribunals.

It also remains to highlight the great shadows of the case, particularly as regards the call for applications issued by the IMA in 2007 which led to the appointment of Nouri caterer, and the role of EPI coverage has played in this matter, allowing Nour does not enforce the Act and Article L.122-12 for over 5 months.