The umpire judge made the decision following the hearing held February 5, 2008 at 09 h 00: "(...) Recognizes the existence of a manifestly unlawful. Met exonerated the company Yara PRESTIGE. (...) Condemns severally HOLDING Nour and Nour IMA payable as an advance on account of wages covering the period 1 September 2007 to January 15, 2008.
(...) Condemns severally Nour HOLDING Nour and IMA to pay each applicant the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED EUROS (800 euros) as a provision for claims on damages and the sum of FIVE HUNDRED EURO (EUR 500) on the basis of Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Ordered borne by Nour and Nour HOLDING IMA continuing contracts of employment of applicants. (...) Remember that the order is fully enforceable provisionally. Condemns Nour and Nour HOLDING IMA costs. "
The 28 employees protected by the CGT at last succeeded to justice so that their rights are more violated.
However, the struggle for the restoration of truth does not stop there.
It is the 4 employees who have made a follow parallel approach, which they have appealed the decision rendered incompetent by the court for interim measures of employment tribunals.
It also remains to highlight the great shadows of the case, particularly as regards the call for applications issued by the IMA in 2007 which led to the appointment of Nouri caterer, and the role of EPI coverage has played in this matter, allowing Nour does not enforce the Act and Article L.122-12 for over 5 months.
0 comments:
Post a Comment