CORRUPTION AT THE SPCA
We thought all the problems of the SPCA rested on the shoulders of Barnotti and disappear with his departure. Error!
Information checked me suggest that there is a major problem in service inspections that led to the theft of dogs in the past month as in the 80s when the inspectors were so brazen that they would steal the animals and were charges of cruelty against anyone who could not afford to defend themselves.
owners puppy mills were never bothered and have flourished to become a scourge in this province with the support of municipal inspectors, those of the SPCA and the police. They work illegally and had always "cash" to resolve situations.
So I said, last month, was reported to the SPCA a case of blatant cruelty to Mirabel. It was a credible witness to support the seizure. Despite all our efforts and insistence, the director Alanna Devine did respond immediately "there was not enough evidence."
We know better. The truth always comes out, provided we speak.
Inspector Nathalie Bouille had gone to this address there are a couple of months and did nothing, she had made as usual and turnarounds at the gate of the barn. The torturer boasted to anyone who will listen that he was not afraid of the SPCA. I even think it's him that I had met at Mirabel and told me that unless I asked him he had to slip money to the inspector and here was settled quickly.
But the torturer even bragged to his neighbor again last week that he had been advised by Nathalie Bouille to relocate his dogs. Here it was Tuesday. On Friday morning, the powdered of Anima-Quebec is presented on site. They are not inspected, of course, there was nobody, not even dogs. It would not have made much difference because AQ does not help the dogs and do not protect against torturers. "It makes recommendations. Owners from puppy mills do not care about you any recommendations?
Anima-Quebec has always said that his inspection service was proof of corruption and that its inspections were unannounced. If the torturer is telling the truth and I think that's how he operates a place of torture said puppy mill for over 20 years and has never been disturbed. When Nathalie Bouille
will steal dogs health and well kept in ideal conditions in St-Lin to let others into the hands of a psychopath who has a poodle with a deep wound untreated, a female boxer on the verge give birth outside attached by less 20, somebody is not doing its job.
IS THAT WHICH WILL PROTECT THE ANIMALS? WHO WILL PROTECT THEIR PROTECTION AGAINST THE COBS unjustified and unjustifiable? AND WHO WILL PROTECT THOSE WHO denounce these exploiters and abusers ANIMALS AGAINST THEIR THREATS ?......."
The Board of Directors of the SPCA and the QA need a serious awareness .
Yet all these inspectors have returned to a puppy mill and know the horrors. Their greed outweighs their sense of duty. The people who appointed them must also take responsibility for the death of all these little creatures helpless in horrible conditions.
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
How Much Does Patti The Beanie Baby Worth?
CAROLE LAPALME NOT GUILTY?
FILE CAROLE LAPALME, SEIZURE OF A SHELTER OR A PUPPY MILL?
Despite our repeated efforts over the past three weeks, the presence of credible witnesses and an exchange of correspondence with the SPCA and the Humane Society, we were unable to inspect the dilapidated barn in a puppy mill in Mirabel because Nathalie Bouille SPCA inspector found that there "was insufficient evidence." For now, I will not discuss the case below that because there is a more urgent case. The same
Nathalie Bouille who visited St-Lin with the police, the HSI trucks, etc. to inspect and seize a REFUGE operated by a lady who thought only of doing good to animals and idle youths in the area. The lady had the necessary permits, was well known to neighbors who supported and did not return from this procedure. She had successfully placed 62 animals in the last year and asked for nothing left to take the neighborhood.
Bad publicity whipped up by the SPCA (providing images that had nothing to do with his shelter because no media was on hand for the seizure) also had the effect of activists believe that the lady was guilty even before the trial and a small group went in Joliette to the trial to demonstrate outside the palace. I had warned that the Loranger Crown Attorney was corrupt and to be careful. I hope they understand now why he did not talk to them.
We thought that with the departure of Barnotti, such input would disappear. Apparently not. So the problem is deeper at the SPCA, in terms of personnel and inspectors. The new board has no more control over employees and the bad apples are still in the barrel. When I hear
Davenport and his ilk say when it seized the worst cases they have seen, I wonder if it's because they have no memory or to the sensasionnalisme. While no media was present during the seizure in this refuge, how is it that images shown were rude on TV. Where did these pictures? Counsel for the lady asked. Either the media has shown anything either of their supposed images were provided by Nathalie Bouille to discredit the lady. But all the neighbors who visited the shelter agreed to say that these images do not come from the refuge. So ... ..
Like I said, it was thought that the fabrication of evidence was finished with the era Barnotti and a little honesty would prevail in the testimony. It seems that there is still the SPCA inspectors. As the public will not open their eyes and ears of other animals suffer the same fate and other people will be shattered life. We have boxes of documents showing the flight of animals by the SPCA, Barnotti time and before. We just opened another box to put the record of this refuge.
The lady pleaded not guilty to the SPCA and must spend large sums to defend themselves. It seems that his counsel had understood the whole story, which is rare in this area. The defense lawyers are there to make money, not to defend women accused falsely. But no one understands where the case originally. What triggered the collapse? It's always like that with the SPCA. To justify their actions and produce other evidence, they rely on secrecy and collusion, false evidence and their media contacts. The trial
is long and painful for the animal lover. Difficult, especially with the disclosure because that's how the lady learned that her arthritic dog of 12 years who needed medication (she had told the porridge in the morning of the seizure) was simply euthanized. The little dog who slept on his pillow for 13 years, also disappeared. The trained dog who had a mission to keep the team against the Raiders, also killed. He was only 2 years.
After the seizure, the lady asked the Bouille to see his dogs, to reassure them and calm them. The slurry is answering "your dogs are no longer in Montreal. " What is the answer? As far as I know, Quebec, seized property can not be arranged before the end of the trial. We saw in the media that the party was to HSI states with 50 dogs. Was it those in the shelter? Nobody knows because the last two dogs seized were all kept together and as they do not talk, nobody can say where they come from, except the owner.
She and her lawyer can not understand what happened, who made a complaint of cruelty and on what basis. The record is poorly assembled and most is corruption suffered by the Crown Loranger (I have no problem writing it because I have evidence of collusion) and his complicity with the SPCA and Berger Blanc which has resulted in a search warrant and seizure of these dogs. As written
Julius Grey, corruption exists at all levels but it is still necessary to prove to get rid of. People know but dare not come here because they are afraid of being afraid. How a good woman can defend herself if nobody comes to help? The record is all wrong but we must prove to the judge hoping that will not Loranger spoke before the judge as he often does.
Who says inspector says corruption. The temptation is too strong. Whether at the municipal level or the SPCA, the principle is the same. The puppy mill owners have plenty of money "cash" to buy peace, but this lady, all its assets passed on his animals. The lady who is declared invalible for over 5 years suffering from rheumatoid arthritis inflammatory degenerative nevertheless continued its mission of refuge. But now she needs help, testimonies of people who know a lot about the input methods of the SPCA. We hope they have the courage to show themselves.
This entry is so illogical if not fraudulent, how is it that the lady who was supposedly so cruel to animals to the point of putting a load, was not for his horses that were left and two other dogs. But he took the little dog who lived in the house and slept in his bed.
No, the house was not a slum and the team either. Neighbors who attended the lady will tell you. Children who would take care of dogs have been heart broken by this whole thing and do not understand. Neither did we. The lady must now defend not only Court but to the media before the public forgets very quickly because his reputation has been tainted and thereby the work of all humane. CONCLUSION
's a lady who had a mission to protect animals and help humans. She comes to understand that it is humans who are cruel and not necessarily those we think.
Tthe morning of the seizure, she went in Joliette important for a medical examination and could not follow the flight of his dogs on his property. La Bouille said simply, without heart, to his brother who was him there "is here, move there, it will be better for her." Better for her? Or better for porridge? It could well proceed without a witness to the theft of animals. Who says there is no other evidence that also disappeared, as the health records of dogs, the vet bill of $ 400 for the last operation, etc..
Quebec does not need more laws to protect animals if it is to be used against animal protection. The SPCA is unable to close "real puppy mills, we have the evidence here, even if you ask other laws, if improperly applied, that does not serve the rights of animals to a better life.
The only decent thing to do now by the SPCA, is that with everything they have heard at the trial date is to withdraw the charges against this lady and to submit, with their apologies , his dogs, if they can find them of course because they often lose.
WE CAN NOT BEAR AN ORGANIZATION IN WHICH SOME PEOPLE WERE PUT THEIR CONFIDENCE TO DO THE WRONG TO SHELTER JUST BECAUSE THEY MADE THE COMPETITION.
WRONG!!
Otherwise, it's the work of these small shelters that is compromised and the animals can not afford to lose protective because we have just seen, we can not rely on the SPCA.
FILE CAROLE LAPALME, SEIZURE OF A SHELTER OR A PUPPY MILL?
Despite our repeated efforts over the past three weeks, the presence of credible witnesses and an exchange of correspondence with the SPCA and the Humane Society, we were unable to inspect the dilapidated barn in a puppy mill in Mirabel because Nathalie Bouille SPCA inspector found that there "was insufficient evidence." For now, I will not discuss the case below that because there is a more urgent case. The same
Nathalie Bouille who visited St-Lin with the police, the HSI trucks, etc. to inspect and seize a REFUGE operated by a lady who thought only of doing good to animals and idle youths in the area. The lady had the necessary permits, was well known to neighbors who supported and did not return from this procedure. She had successfully placed 62 animals in the last year and asked for nothing left to take the neighborhood.
Bad publicity whipped up by the SPCA (providing images that had nothing to do with his shelter because no media was on hand for the seizure) also had the effect of activists believe that the lady was guilty even before the trial and a small group went in Joliette to the trial to demonstrate outside the palace. I had warned that the Loranger Crown Attorney was corrupt and to be careful. I hope they understand now why he did not talk to them.
We thought that with the departure of Barnotti, such input would disappear. Apparently not. So the problem is deeper at the SPCA, in terms of personnel and inspectors. The new board has no more control over employees and the bad apples are still in the barrel. When I hear
Davenport and his ilk say when it seized the worst cases they have seen, I wonder if it's because they have no memory or to the sensasionnalisme. While no media was present during the seizure in this refuge, how is it that images shown were rude on TV. Where did these pictures? Counsel for the lady asked. Either the media has shown anything either of their supposed images were provided by Nathalie Bouille to discredit the lady. But all the neighbors who visited the shelter agreed to say that these images do not come from the refuge. So ... ..
Like I said, it was thought that the fabrication of evidence was finished with the era Barnotti and a little honesty would prevail in the testimony. It seems that there is still the SPCA inspectors. As the public will not open their eyes and ears of other animals suffer the same fate and other people will be shattered life. We have boxes of documents showing the flight of animals by the SPCA, Barnotti time and before. We just opened another box to put the record of this refuge.
The lady pleaded not guilty to the SPCA and must spend large sums to defend themselves. It seems that his counsel had understood the whole story, which is rare in this area. The defense lawyers are there to make money, not to defend women accused falsely. But no one understands where the case originally. What triggered the collapse? It's always like that with the SPCA. To justify their actions and produce other evidence, they rely on secrecy and collusion, false evidence and their media contacts. The trial
is long and painful for the animal lover. Difficult, especially with the disclosure because that's how the lady learned that her arthritic dog of 12 years who needed medication (she had told the porridge in the morning of the seizure) was simply euthanized. The little dog who slept on his pillow for 13 years, also disappeared. The trained dog who had a mission to keep the team against the Raiders, also killed. He was only 2 years.
After the seizure, the lady asked the Bouille to see his dogs, to reassure them and calm them. The slurry is answering "your dogs are no longer in Montreal. " What is the answer? As far as I know, Quebec, seized property can not be arranged before the end of the trial. We saw in the media that the party was to HSI states with 50 dogs. Was it those in the shelter? Nobody knows because the last two dogs seized were all kept together and as they do not talk, nobody can say where they come from, except the owner.
She and her lawyer can not understand what happened, who made a complaint of cruelty and on what basis. The record is poorly assembled and most is corruption suffered by the Crown Loranger (I have no problem writing it because I have evidence of collusion) and his complicity with the SPCA and Berger Blanc which has resulted in a search warrant and seizure of these dogs. As written
Julius Grey, corruption exists at all levels but it is still necessary to prove to get rid of. People know but dare not come here because they are afraid of being afraid. How a good woman can defend herself if nobody comes to help? The record is all wrong but we must prove to the judge hoping that will not Loranger spoke before the judge as he often does.
Who says inspector says corruption. The temptation is too strong. Whether at the municipal level or the SPCA, the principle is the same. The puppy mill owners have plenty of money "cash" to buy peace, but this lady, all its assets passed on his animals. The lady who is declared invalible for over 5 years suffering from rheumatoid arthritis inflammatory degenerative nevertheless continued its mission of refuge. But now she needs help, testimonies of people who know a lot about the input methods of the SPCA. We hope they have the courage to show themselves.
This entry is so illogical if not fraudulent, how is it that the lady who was supposedly so cruel to animals to the point of putting a load, was not for his horses that were left and two other dogs. But he took the little dog who lived in the house and slept in his bed.
No, the house was not a slum and the team either. Neighbors who attended the lady will tell you. Children who would take care of dogs have been heart broken by this whole thing and do not understand. Neither did we. The lady must now defend not only Court but to the media before the public forgets very quickly because his reputation has been tainted and thereby the work of all humane. CONCLUSION
's a lady who had a mission to protect animals and help humans. She comes to understand that it is humans who are cruel and not necessarily those we think.
Tthe morning of the seizure, she went in Joliette important for a medical examination and could not follow the flight of his dogs on his property. La Bouille said simply, without heart, to his brother who was him there "is here, move there, it will be better for her." Better for her? Or better for porridge? It could well proceed without a witness to the theft of animals. Who says there is no other evidence that also disappeared, as the health records of dogs, the vet bill of $ 400 for the last operation, etc..
Quebec does not need more laws to protect animals if it is to be used against animal protection. The SPCA is unable to close "real puppy mills, we have the evidence here, even if you ask other laws, if improperly applied, that does not serve the rights of animals to a better life.
The only decent thing to do now by the SPCA, is that with everything they have heard at the trial date is to withdraw the charges against this lady and to submit, with their apologies , his dogs, if they can find them of course because they often lose.
WE CAN NOT BEAR AN ORGANIZATION IN WHICH SOME PEOPLE WERE PUT THEIR CONFIDENCE TO DO THE WRONG TO SHELTER JUST BECAUSE THEY MADE THE COMPETITION.
WRONG!!
Otherwise, it's the work of these small shelters that is compromised and the animals can not afford to lose protective because we have just seen, we can not rely on the SPCA.
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Coversyl 8mg Not As Effective As Before
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STRAY CATS?
RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRAY CATS
JE, JANINE LAROSE, blames CRISIS OF STRAY CATS AND CRUELTY TO THEIR PLACE:
1. - First, some owners cats:
- To require the adoption of a kitten imagining it will never grow but who will abandon when it becomes too great;
- Not to try to find accommodation where they can bring their cat but will not hesitate to get rid of it in unacceptable conditions;
- By failing to sterilize their pets and by females in heat on the balcony when they make too much noise, making babies and then a warning of the scope and the other is sent and the mother to the slaughterhouse, even worse, we keep two babies, the couple and the cycle is repeated ;
- By not doing when he does not treat the crystals in the bladder but sending it to the pound or the SPCA because ill he be put to death all alone in great pain until the fatal injection;
- By letting out their cat outside, there are too many pitfalls for a cat in this country. Then when asked why he lost: "he wanted to leave" FALSE: the cat is the ferryman of the door. They will spend any door to see what is the other side.
- By neglecting to look for when he loses. A cat will lose the same as a child. There are some who have no sense of direction.
- By not identifying their cat in case, a necklace and medallion here is not expensive;
- Do not think that Montrealers are the only ones to abandon their pets in an empty home when they move. The U.S. has seen this increase with the rise of "foreclosures".
Few exceptions that bring their cat to a venerable age and must now be in Felicia.
2. - The apartment owners to prohibit tenants to bring their pet. This is not the animal who is dirty, the renter should care for them. Some families are messy and destructive even without animals.
3. - The neighbors Owners of cats the BusyBodies who, instead of helping the lost pet will capture him and bring him to the pound by saying it's theirs, and by requiring the killing. These BusyBodies who will not hesitate to use traps and antifreeze to harm cats. They are not able to help a cat to go home, track owners, but have enough energy to get the hang of the antifreeze.
Tip: If you do not intend to help the animal, leave it where it is, others take charge.
4. - The municipalities who, instead of giving taxpayers the tools to empower and protect the cats, state regulations without looking like: do not feed stray cats, no more than 2 cats per unit, etc.. while thinking that does not feed the cats will disappear. It is not by requiring licenses either that the problem will be solved. Simply does not tell the owners where they can recover their lost pet is a complete lack of ethics. The Taxpayer did not for his money with the services offered by the pound municipalities.
This is not giving the contract to the pound to trap the cats and killing them that the problem will be solved. There is a principle in nature that when a vacuum against predators, it is filled with other predators or other species.
5. - Pierre Barnotti and the Board of Directors of the SPCA which no education for over 20 years and were content to take the cats that brought them and kill them while promising to to adopt; have passed unsterilized cats and failing to provide a clinic for sterilization at lower prices;
6. - Pierre Couture and White Berger for sending cats that he has made in laboratories while promising they would be "adopted". There is no adoption at its establishment is to sell as in pet. Leaving the impression that they will be adopted, he appropriates property under false representation and the pet owner believes he did the right thing. This is a misrepresentation. It's the same thing for the Inspector Kennel in Lanaudière and other services impounded.
I will ignore here the methods of euthanasia foul of these places.
7. - The pet sell kittens at ridiculous prices and to anyone. These cats gather on the streets before summer is over. It is irresponsible not to give the minimum information and advice to buyers. Besides taking in some pet care little if they become ill and die in the back room without care.
8. - The veterinary clinics, which by their prohibitive prices, force cat owners not to be sterilized, requiring unnecessary vaccinations perfectly year after year, increasing and the cost of keeping a cat. Playing on the guilt of the owner of the animal if not vaccinated each year. By asking hundreds of dollars for euthanasia, which costs almost nothing. Result: the owners let their pets die in pain.
9. - The Dr. Pépin and other TV hosts to spread nonsense in their text and TV shows such as: it can cost up to $ 15,000 in fees for the life of a cat. At that rate, people no longer want to adopt. The majority did not have that kind of money to put on an animal. This is normal. To have a popular show and heard, there is an obligation to tell the truth.
10 .- Finally, I blame media not to publish articles or stories and explaining the true situation. We simply text "ti-kitty" but all the suffering of cats wandering is ignored.
At least once a month, I send a text in any newspaper. They are rarely published.
With other agencies, we established in 2008 "National Adoption Week of cats." Press releases were sent to all newspapers and electronic media. How many have mentioned? Zero times zero. Volunteers depend on media to education, but the response is low. It has so far tried to stay polite to the indifference of the media against cruelty to animals in Quebec but you should hear what the girls tell each other.
*******************
The catastrophy That looms ahead for the cat population: RABIES
We now Have A rabies in raccoons epidemy coming from Vermont Into Canada. The Authorities are doing to Contain Their Best it iz at Montreal view it's doors. If it gets closer, panic set in and Will of course, What They are Human being, Stray Cats Will Be Slaughtered by THE HUNDREDS ... just in case.
Rabies, disaster is upon us
I hate to think what will happen if the rabies epidemic that has plagued the population of raccoons in the south of the river Richelieu, spreads more far.
If the epidemic had to advance, the biologists called experts will make a massacre of cats in the streets of Montreal as they killed last summer more than 5000 pups that were not even carrying rabies.
note which says: Then the biologist in charge of the operation was decorated with a combination of trappers. As a conflict of interest, there is no better. It's dreadful that Quebec is no more civilized. An investigation is warranted.
JE, JANINE LAROSE, blames CRISIS OF STRAY CATS AND CRUELTY TO THEIR PLACE:
1. - First, some owners cats:
- To require the adoption of a kitten imagining it will never grow but who will abandon when it becomes too great;
- Not to try to find accommodation where they can bring their cat but will not hesitate to get rid of it in unacceptable conditions;
- By failing to sterilize their pets and by females in heat on the balcony when they make too much noise, making babies and then a warning of the scope and the other is sent and the mother to the slaughterhouse, even worse, we keep two babies, the couple and the cycle is repeated ;
- By not doing when he does not treat the crystals in the bladder but sending it to the pound or the SPCA because ill he be put to death all alone in great pain until the fatal injection;
- By letting out their cat outside, there are too many pitfalls for a cat in this country. Then when asked why he lost: "he wanted to leave" FALSE: the cat is the ferryman of the door. They will spend any door to see what is the other side.
- By neglecting to look for when he loses. A cat will lose the same as a child. There are some who have no sense of direction.
- By not identifying their cat in case, a necklace and medallion here is not expensive;
- Do not think that Montrealers are the only ones to abandon their pets in an empty home when they move. The U.S. has seen this increase with the rise of "foreclosures".
Few exceptions that bring their cat to a venerable age and must now be in Felicia.
2. - The apartment owners to prohibit tenants to bring their pet. This is not the animal who is dirty, the renter should care for them. Some families are messy and destructive even without animals.
3. - The neighbors Owners of cats the BusyBodies who, instead of helping the lost pet will capture him and bring him to the pound by saying it's theirs, and by requiring the killing. These BusyBodies who will not hesitate to use traps and antifreeze to harm cats. They are not able to help a cat to go home, track owners, but have enough energy to get the hang of the antifreeze.
Tip: If you do not intend to help the animal, leave it where it is, others take charge.
4. - The municipalities who, instead of giving taxpayers the tools to empower and protect the cats, state regulations without looking like: do not feed stray cats, no more than 2 cats per unit, etc.. while thinking that does not feed the cats will disappear. It is not by requiring licenses either that the problem will be solved. Simply does not tell the owners where they can recover their lost pet is a complete lack of ethics. The Taxpayer did not for his money with the services offered by the pound municipalities.
This is not giving the contract to the pound to trap the cats and killing them that the problem will be solved. There is a principle in nature that when a vacuum against predators, it is filled with other predators or other species.
5. - Pierre Barnotti and the Board of Directors of the SPCA which no education for over 20 years and were content to take the cats that brought them and kill them while promising to to adopt; have passed unsterilized cats and failing to provide a clinic for sterilization at lower prices;
6. - Pierre Couture and White Berger for sending cats that he has made in laboratories while promising they would be "adopted". There is no adoption at its establishment is to sell as in pet. Leaving the impression that they will be adopted, he appropriates property under false representation and the pet owner believes he did the right thing. This is a misrepresentation. It's the same thing for the Inspector Kennel in Lanaudière and other services impounded.
I will ignore here the methods of euthanasia foul of these places.
7. - The pet sell kittens at ridiculous prices and to anyone. These cats gather on the streets before summer is over. It is irresponsible not to give the minimum information and advice to buyers. Besides taking in some pet care little if they become ill and die in the back room without care.
8. - The veterinary clinics, which by their prohibitive prices, force cat owners not to be sterilized, requiring unnecessary vaccinations perfectly year after year, increasing and the cost of keeping a cat. Playing on the guilt of the owner of the animal if not vaccinated each year. By asking hundreds of dollars for euthanasia, which costs almost nothing. Result: the owners let their pets die in pain.
9. - The Dr. Pépin and other TV hosts to spread nonsense in their text and TV shows such as: it can cost up to $ 15,000 in fees for the life of a cat. At that rate, people no longer want to adopt. The majority did not have that kind of money to put on an animal. This is normal. To have a popular show and heard, there is an obligation to tell the truth.
10 .- Finally, I blame media not to publish articles or stories and explaining the true situation. We simply text "ti-kitty" but all the suffering of cats wandering is ignored.
At least once a month, I send a text in any newspaper. They are rarely published.
With other agencies, we established in 2008 "National Adoption Week of cats." Press releases were sent to all newspapers and electronic media. How many have mentioned? Zero times zero. Volunteers depend on media to education, but the response is low. It has so far tried to stay polite to the indifference of the media against cruelty to animals in Quebec but you should hear what the girls tell each other.
*******************
The catastrophy That looms ahead for the cat population: RABIES
We now Have A rabies in raccoons epidemy coming from Vermont Into Canada. The Authorities are doing to Contain Their Best it iz at Montreal view it's doors. If it gets closer, panic set in and Will of course, What They are Human being, Stray Cats Will Be Slaughtered by THE HUNDREDS ... just in case.
Rabies, disaster is upon us
I hate to think what will happen if the rabies epidemic that has plagued the population of raccoons in the south of the river Richelieu, spreads more far.
If the epidemic had to advance, the biologists called experts will make a massacre of cats in the streets of Montreal as they killed last summer more than 5000 pups that were not even carrying rabies.
note which says: Then the biologist in charge of the operation was decorated with a combination of trappers. As a conflict of interest, there is no better. It's dreadful that Quebec is no more civilized. An investigation is warranted.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Customized Breast Cancer Wrestling Singlets
Employees threatened
Here's a comment that was left on the blog this Monday, March 24:
"Mr. and Mr. ZB AM
Do you know the law of retaliation? But if misfortune happens, you will pay life for life, for he, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, brlure for burns, wound for wound, bruise for bruise. (Exodus 21.23-25)
I ask you to close your blog who mercilessly slander respectable people. For each post, I promise to do the same, on an unlimited number of blog, forums, groups, websites ... I would make sure your names appear in each search google and yahoo. That they are slandered and partner pornography, homosexuality, racism, political positions, ... Z., I've already given you a taste, it's nothing compared to the strike force that I would put into effect. A., google gives only 5 results on your behalf, for now you have not been targeted. There is no
useful for me: the connections through which I pass are public, the computer is not mine. A proxy in the UK, Germany, Argentina, ... is systematically used. No one utility to shout threats to your blog, it will qu'emplifier my action, because it is not a menance I do.
Applying exactly the same rules that you: smear the opponent, to remain anonymous, cowardly act.
The outcome of this conflict is simple: close the blog and stop the slander. I count on your responsible attitude, your understanding, your understanding and your help to solve our different. The other promise I make, is to erase all traces, all you post on the blog once a farm.
A., you have 24 hours. Otherwise, I invite you to type your name in google in 1 week ... I Selfmade your budding reputation as a jurist. "
=> For information, employees have made a declaration of handrail if this kind of behavior should offend, that statement would turn handrail automatically complaint, which would be a lawsuit.
Here's a comment that was left on the blog this Monday, March 24:
"Mr. and Mr. ZB AM
Do you know the law of retaliation? But if misfortune happens, you will pay life for life, for he, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, brlure for burns, wound for wound, bruise for bruise. (Exodus 21.23-25)
I ask you to close your blog who mercilessly slander respectable people. For each post, I promise to do the same, on an unlimited number of blog, forums, groups, websites ... I would make sure your names appear in each search google and yahoo. That they are slandered and partner pornography, homosexuality, racism, political positions, ... Z., I've already given you a taste, it's nothing compared to the strike force that I would put into effect. A., google gives only 5 results on your behalf, for now you have not been targeted. There is no
useful for me: the connections through which I pass are public, the computer is not mine. A proxy in the UK, Germany, Argentina, ... is systematically used. No one utility to shout threats to your blog, it will qu'emplifier my action, because it is not a menance I do.
Applying exactly the same rules that you: smear the opponent, to remain anonymous, cowardly act.
The outcome of this conflict is simple: close the blog and stop the slander. I count on your responsible attitude, your understanding, your understanding and your help to solve our different. The other promise I make, is to erase all traces, all you post on the blog once a farm.
A., you have 24 hours. Otherwise, I invite you to type your name in google in 1 week ... I Selfmade your budding reputation as a jurist. "
=> For information, employees have made a declaration of handrail if this kind of behavior should offend, that statement would turn handrail automatically complaint, which would be a lawsuit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)