FILE CAROLE LAPALME, SEIZURE OF A SHELTER OR A PUPPY MILL?
Despite our repeated efforts over the past three weeks, the presence of credible witnesses and an exchange of correspondence with the SPCA and the Humane Society, we were unable to inspect the dilapidated barn in a puppy mill in Mirabel because Nathalie Bouille SPCA inspector found that there "was insufficient evidence." For now, I will not discuss the case below that because there is a more urgent case. The same
Nathalie Bouille who visited St-Lin with the police, the HSI trucks, etc. to inspect and seize a REFUGE operated by a lady who thought only of doing good to animals and idle youths in the area. The lady had the necessary permits, was well known to neighbors who supported and did not return from this procedure. She had successfully placed 62 animals in the last year and asked for nothing left to take the neighborhood.
Bad publicity whipped up by the SPCA (providing images that had nothing to do with his shelter because no media was on hand for the seizure) also had the effect of activists believe that the lady was guilty even before the trial and a small group went in Joliette to the trial to demonstrate outside the palace. I had warned that the Loranger Crown Attorney was corrupt and to be careful. I hope they understand now why he did not talk to them.
We thought that with the departure of Barnotti, such input would disappear. Apparently not. So the problem is deeper at the SPCA, in terms of personnel and inspectors. The new board has no more control over employees and the bad apples are still in the barrel. When I hear
Davenport and his ilk say when it seized the worst cases they have seen, I wonder if it's because they have no memory or to the sensasionnalisme. While no media was present during the seizure in this refuge, how is it that images shown were rude on TV. Where did these pictures? Counsel for the lady asked. Either the media has shown anything either of their supposed images were provided by Nathalie Bouille to discredit the lady. But all the neighbors who visited the shelter agreed to say that these images do not come from the refuge. So ... ..
Like I said, it was thought that the fabrication of evidence was finished with the era Barnotti and a little honesty would prevail in the testimony. It seems that there is still the SPCA inspectors. As the public will not open their eyes and ears of other animals suffer the same fate and other people will be shattered life. We have boxes of documents showing the flight of animals by the SPCA, Barnotti time and before. We just opened another box to put the record of this refuge.
The lady pleaded not guilty to the SPCA and must spend large sums to defend themselves. It seems that his counsel had understood the whole story, which is rare in this area. The defense lawyers are there to make money, not to defend women accused falsely. But no one understands where the case originally. What triggered the collapse? It's always like that with the SPCA. To justify their actions and produce other evidence, they rely on secrecy and collusion, false evidence and their media contacts. The trial
is long and painful for the animal lover. Difficult, especially with the disclosure because that's how the lady learned that her arthritic dog of 12 years who needed medication (she had told the porridge in the morning of the seizure) was simply euthanized. The little dog who slept on his pillow for 13 years, also disappeared. The trained dog who had a mission to keep the team against the Raiders, also killed. He was only 2 years.
After the seizure, the lady asked the Bouille to see his dogs, to reassure them and calm them. The slurry is answering "your dogs are no longer in Montreal. " What is the answer? As far as I know, Quebec, seized property can not be arranged before the end of the trial. We saw in the media that the party was to HSI states with 50 dogs. Was it those in the shelter? Nobody knows because the last two dogs seized were all kept together and as they do not talk, nobody can say where they come from, except the owner.
She and her lawyer can not understand what happened, who made a complaint of cruelty and on what basis. The record is poorly assembled and most is corruption suffered by the Crown Loranger (I have no problem writing it because I have evidence of collusion) and his complicity with the SPCA and Berger Blanc which has resulted in a search warrant and seizure of these dogs. As written
Julius Grey, corruption exists at all levels but it is still necessary to prove to get rid of. People know but dare not come here because they are afraid of being afraid. How a good woman can defend herself if nobody comes to help? The record is all wrong but we must prove to the judge hoping that will not Loranger spoke before the judge as he often does.
Who says inspector says corruption. The temptation is too strong. Whether at the municipal level or the SPCA, the principle is the same. The puppy mill owners have plenty of money "cash" to buy peace, but this lady, all its assets passed on his animals. The lady who is declared invalible for over 5 years suffering from rheumatoid arthritis inflammatory degenerative nevertheless continued its mission of refuge. But now she needs help, testimonies of people who know a lot about the input methods of the SPCA. We hope they have the courage to show themselves.
This entry is so illogical if not fraudulent, how is it that the lady who was supposedly so cruel to animals to the point of putting a load, was not for his horses that were left and two other dogs. But he took the little dog who lived in the house and slept in his bed.
No, the house was not a slum and the team either. Neighbors who attended the lady will tell you. Children who would take care of dogs have been heart broken by this whole thing and do not understand. Neither did we. The lady must now defend not only Court but to the media before the public forgets very quickly because his reputation has been tainted and thereby the work of all humane. CONCLUSION
's a lady who had a mission to protect animals and help humans. She comes to understand that it is humans who are cruel and not necessarily those we think.
Tthe morning of the seizure, she went in Joliette important for a medical examination and could not follow the flight of his dogs on his property. La Bouille said simply, without heart, to his brother who was him there "is here, move there, it will be better for her." Better for her? Or better for porridge? It could well proceed without a witness to the theft of animals. Who says there is no other evidence that also disappeared, as the health records of dogs, the vet bill of $ 400 for the last operation, etc..
Quebec does not need more laws to protect animals if it is to be used against animal protection. The SPCA is unable to close "real puppy mills, we have the evidence here, even if you ask other laws, if improperly applied, that does not serve the rights of animals to a better life.
The only decent thing to do now by the SPCA, is that with everything they have heard at the trial date is to withdraw the charges against this lady and to submit, with their apologies , his dogs, if they can find them of course because they often lose.
WE CAN NOT BEAR AN ORGANIZATION IN WHICH SOME PEOPLE WERE PUT THEIR CONFIDENCE TO DO THE WRONG TO SHELTER JUST BECAUSE THEY MADE THE COMPETITION.
WRONG!!
Otherwise, it's the work of these small shelters that is compromised and the animals can not afford to lose protective because we have just seen, we can not rely on the SPCA.
0 comments:
Post a Comment