threatened with closure by saying people close to Mr Baudis
After just a few days of existence, this blog already seems threatened. Indeed, a man named Daniel from Laurentia, is called journalist the FIGARO pressured to stop any publication on this matter.
Here's what he wrote:
"I will not leave you alone as the blog will not be closed. What you do is slander and it's criminal. I assure you that you are taking unmeasured and unnecessary risks.
I'll leave you alone after deleting all elements referring to this case. I'll leave before 12am prevent counsel for Mr Baudis (former MP, former Chairman of the CSA, current president of the Institut du Monde Arabe, the future senator) and counsel for both institutions maligned (IMA, Noura) for criminal prosecution of three lawyers to you. "
Note that obviously, from this reporter, Mr Baudis is already guaranteed to be a senator even before the elections! What are Elections then?
Moreover, it seems in a hurry to try to stop any publication on this matter, in violation of democratic principles and freedom of expression. Bizarre for a journalist.
Regarding defamation and slander, this blog is not concerned, since it merely relaying facts and proven as well as written documents. There is no defamation on this site.
Obviously, the truth seems to bother some people. And more so that evidence of bad faith does not exist in this folder, you just have to read the following article by clicking here to get an accurate idea of the veracity of the facts asserted in this blog.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Sunday, January 6, 2008
Great Ways To Congradulate Pregnancy
Mr Dominique Baudis 35 families deprived of their jobs and condoning unacceptable behavior!
Instead to stop this outrageous jeopardizes the part of Nour, Dominique Baudis, the prime contractor, does absolutely nothing and left to rot an already very complicated for employees (they left without wages, no job, no status or social protection): what really matters to his eyes being more likely further his political career!
This case is true, and the 35 employees who were assigned to the restoration of the Institut du Monde Arabe, and who are deprived of jobs, status and salaries since September 1st 2007.
Indeed, Dominique Baudis, the current President of the Institut du Monde Arabe (IMA) brought by public tender for a new concessionaire to restore the IMA (replacing the previous one, which he denounced contract), the famous Lebanese catering NOUR: it refuses to apply Article L.122-12 of the Labor Code which requires the resumption of employees, and said contemptuously that he will pay no salary and will not resume person.
Indeed, Dominique Baudis, the current President of the Institut du Monde Arabe (IMA) brought by public tender for a new concessionaire to restore the IMA (replacing the previous one, which he denounced contract), the famous Lebanese catering NOUR: it refuses to apply Article L.122-12 of the Labor Code which requires the resumption of employees, and said contemptuously that he will pay no salary and will not resume person.
NOUR strategy is clear: playing shows letting the matter drag on for several years justice, since he knows full well industrial tribunal that judges are not professional judges, they are not competent to judge referred a case concerning Article L.122-12 of the Labour Code. Thus, the case could drag on for very long, which no-one 'except of course Nour and the IMA.
Instead to stop this outrageous jeopardizes the part of Nour, Dominique Baudis, the prime contractor, does absolutely nothing and left to rot an already very complicated for employees (they left without wages, no job, no status or social protection): what really matters to his eyes being more likely further his political career!
Saturday, January 5, 2008
Tights Volleyball Cameltoe
Summary of the case from an article of "worker" Paris of November 2007. Why
'Institut du Monde Arabe
Very good restaurant, but hard to digest!
Very good restaurant, but hard to digest!
Since September 1, employees of the restaurant Institute of the Arab world are without pay, no job and no social security coverage. The irony is that everyone washes his hands while rubbing them.
After the institute , chaired by Dominique Baudis, denounced the concession contract food that bound the company Yara Prestige benefit of society Noura, it was logical to take on the employees and the activity continues. Moreover, it was more of a Labour Code that logic!
But when it comes to assume its responsibilities, each with a disconcerting cynicism, to pass the hot potato and adapts to its own sauce. The situation is this: Yara Luxury is no longer operating the restaurant, but employees are still in place. No termination has been notified, since the transfer is legally automatic. In addition, the Institute intends to retain the activity of the restaurant under its responsibility. This requires an urgent renovation moreover, its activity ceased in advance since early September, which does not help employees who do not know who to contact to resolve their situation.
Institute, initially, tried to blame Luxury in Yara grounds that these employees belong to him and had to repeat them. When CGT was noticed there was no question that employees sit on two months' salary and they wanted to continue working on their website, the version has changed. Especially as we Baudis reminded that the Institute maintained that it imposed the restoration and renovation of the restaurant. Unwilling to pay, or even advance wages, Baudis was once eager to send to the transferee company Noura, although the responsibility of the Institute vis-à-vis employees of the restaurant is clearly established.
As Noura society, the answer is like a giant arm of honor, to employees as the labor code: she says with contempt it will pay no salary and no person will resume.
Obviously before the Labour Court as we know it will be resolved, but we still need to acknowledge and encourage our comrades who are fighting for their jobs and denounce the last three months the attitude of the payer as that of the buyer. In our view, neither one nor the other employees want to keep.
We will not fail to have special attention to Dominique Baudis who opened with great fanfare the new restaurant with his new card and new employees when he said in Le Parisien, 24 October: We are perplexed by the position Noura society. Had we known we would not accept this teaching. "
A special menu has been crafted for our comrades. Baudis has prepared the Turkish delight and peeled onions and when to Noura: it has responsible for the harissa ... "
Remi Picaud and Stephane Fustec, the Journal of the Departmental Union CGT Paris.
Europe Cooking School
Nouri refused to apply Article L.122-12
The famous Lebanese catering
We will have to explain to us as the sign has been involved in a tender indicating the existence of 35 employees as if they did not exist (given that the social issue is a given incompressible tender)? Also difficult to believe that Nour was unaware when he arrived there were employees on site, whereas they were present every day on the front of the IMA for their rights and the resumption of their work ?
- The room contained no material.
The famous Lebanese catering
NOUR ( http://www.noura.com/ ) refuses to take on the employees of the restoration of the IMA because according to him, the conditions of application of Article L. 122-12 of the Labor Code are not met in this case because there is no continuation of an economic entity retaining its identity and whose work is continued or resumed.
For this he cites the following arguments:
- He was not aware of employees at his arrival.
We will have to explain to us as the sign has been involved in a tender indicating the existence of 35 employees as if they did not exist (given that the social issue is a given incompressible tender)? Also difficult to believe that Nour was unaware when he arrived there were employees on site, whereas they were present every day on the front of the IMA for their rights and the resumption of their work ?
- The room contained no material.
A bailiff carried out at the request of the Arab World Institute shows otherwise, it contains a list of all the hardware on site at the time of arrival of the new dealership.
-Finally, NOUR justify non-application of Article L.122-12 by the fact that its production methods are different.
In counsel's Catering, "(...) the previous operator exercised a catering business and as such, he produced, manufactured and manufactured the dishes on the spot. NOUR company (...) has a central kitchen, which is responsible for manufacture, make and deliver to restaurants all the group meals already prepared, so that the Company will manufacture NOUR not place the dishes. "(sic)
This argument, besides the fact it is quite amazing for a restaurant, do not allow non-application of Article L.122-12.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)